| vista and 2 physical processors |
|
 |
Index ‹ Windows Vista ‹ Windows Vista
|
- Previous
- 1
- Windows Vista >> Cyclic Redundancy Check Errorhi,
i have a cd, and when i copy it on my computer, i receive a error with this
message: "cyclic redundancy check". What means that and what can I do to
solve it? It is strange, because in the past with the same CD i never receive
this error. Can someone to accord me little help?
- 2
- Windows Vista >> U.S. military div switching to Mac..............well well, whaddayaknow...
http://vistasucks.wordpress.com/2007/12/26/us-army-were-switching-to-macs/
Wallington, a division chief in the Army's office of enterprise
information systems, says the military is quietly working to integrate
Macintosh computers into its systems to make them harder to hack.
That's because fewer attacks have been designed to infiltrate Mac
computers, and adding more Macs to the military's computer mix makes
it tougher to destabilize a group of military computers with a single
attack, Wallington says.
now you KNOW that if the U.S. military is considering switching to
macs M$ must be in trouble... this is truly music to my ears....
and I hope one day they get into SERIOUS trouble, financial and
otherwise (legal, for example), for the piece of crap they have
released to the world and made pass for a professionally-developed
OS.. which it definitely is NOT...
- 3
- Windows Vista >> Host/Remote SoftwareIs there another solution to Symantec's PCAnywhere built in to Xp and Vista?
I had to change my drawers after seeing how much Symantec wanted for each
seat of their software.
TIA
-Greg
- 4
- Windows Vista >> Simplest (Vista-compatible) macro-maker ???Objective is to hit easy combinations of keys to
generate small blocks of text, like address, driving
directions, description, etc. Nothing more, though it
must be Vista-compatible.
Tried Phrase Express, but it's constantly begging and
intrusive, and is more than I need.
Just looked at autohotkey, which seems to be the Empire
State Building of macromakers. I need a rented room on
the lower east side.
THANKS
Sil
- 5
- Windows Vista >> DEP and Windows Explorer shutting downThere have been two problems recently nagging me on Vista.
1. Data Execution Prevention closes many programs I need, and I can not edit
the settings.
2. Everytime I try going to My Documents, Control Panel, My Computer, etc,
Windows Explorer needs to close and I can not access any of it.
This has been really annoying and I need help, fast.
- 6
- 7
- Windows Vista >> Going back to Windows XP HomeOK. I had enough of Vista also. I want to go back to XP. I see that I can do
a clean install to put XP back into my system. But what about all my music,
data, programs etc. I can't save them on my external HD because it only
works with Windows XP and not vista. No driver. Am I stuck or is there a good
and easy suggestion that someone can come up with. I do have 2 hard drives so
maybe put everything on one drive and install XP on the other? Please help.
I've had enough of Vista. I was using Vista home premium and I want to go
back to Windows XP home SP2. Thanks for your help and sugg. Try not to make
to difficult for me, I'm not the best at this sort of thing.
- 8
- Windows Vista >> Weird robocopy results for users folder in VistaHello folks, I'm wondering if anyone can shed some light on something
that I've seen going on since making the switch to Vista.
I use task scheduler to run a robocopy script (as administrator) which
under XP would synchronize the "my documents" folder to an external
server.
With the changes in Vista I am trying to synchronize the data now under
the "users" folder and I'm seeing some strange behavior.
When the "users\jmpage2" folder is copied it appears that for many
files/folders multiple copies are created due to the virtual folder
mapping of "my documents" within the "users\jmpage2" hierarchy. In
other words, not only do all of my pictures show up under
"users\jmpage2\pictures" they also wind up getting copied a second time
under "users\jmpage2\my documents\my pictures".
I've put in copy exclusions for some of these folders with the /xd
switch in robocopy but I'm hoping that there's a more elegant way of
doing this. I'm also noticing now under vista that many files now seem
to exist in multiple places, for example it appears as though my
outlook.pst file is in 3 different places!
Any help appreciated. :cry:
--
jmpage2
- 9
- Windows Vista >> user profile won't loadWHEN I ENTER MY PASSWORD TO LOGON TO WINDOWS I GET THE MESSAGE THAT THE USER
PROFILE SERVICE FAILED THE LOGON & THE USER PROFILE CAN'T BE LOADED. CAN
ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO FIX THIS? I AM THEM LOGGED OUT AND CAN'T GO FURTHER.
THANKS
--
sam
- 10
- Windows Vista >> Vista 64 Windows Memory Diagnostic Tool - False NegativeVista 64, Asus P5E v502 bios, Core 2 Quad, 4 gb crucial RAM, No over
clocking, standard ram speed,
I have been getting intermitent blue screen of death. Afterward my machine
warm boots, and often I receive Bad Bios CheckSum error. I power all the way
down and then power on and boot no problem.
I tried running the Windows Memory Diagnostic Tool. It came up with a
problem, but didn't identify which stick. I pulled one and reran, everything
was OK. That was a bit of a cooincidence. I tried putting one of the other
chips in the slot the one I removed came from, still OK. I put all sticks
back and the diagnostic ran clean. I thougth I dodged a bullet. Sometime
reseating will fix these things.
I came home after work and sure enough Bad Bios Check Sum. I powered off
rebooted and ran the mem test and it diagnosed a problem.
Is this bad RAM, bad MB, or bad bios?
TIA
- 11
- Windows Vista >> Microsoft Word 97 installation failureI tried to install Microsoft Word 97 on my new
Vista Home Premium laptop. It ended up
/user/<username>/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word...
Actually, it failed to install.
It appears that it should be located
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Word
(q1) should I change user to admin?
(q2) is there a better suggested location?
Tnx,
Charles
- 12
- Windows Vista >> com surrogatehow can i get rid of this message as every time i open my media folder up it
appears then turns my system off -any ideas please
- 13
- Windows Vista >> Gates: Windows 7 may come 'in the next year'http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments.asp?HeadlineIndex=43309
MIAMI--Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates on Friday indicated that Windows 7, the
next major version of Windows, could come within the next year, far ahead of
the development schedule previously indicated by the software maker.
In response to a question about Windows Vista, Gates, speaking before the
Inter-American Development Bank here, said: "Sometime in the next year or so
we will have a new version." Referring to Windows 7, the code name for the
next full release of Windows client software, Gates said: "I'm
super-enthused about what it will do in lots of ways."
- 14
- Windows Vista >> How 2 open USR file?A fellow worker gave me some data in a USR file format, and I can't open it.
What program do I need to open it. It's late and I meet with FEMA tomorrow
on this data.
- 15
- Windows Vista >> Folder view problemAlmost all folders in my PC have Music view. Album, Artist, etc.
I try Restore folders view to default view into Folder and Options but
that is help unlikely.
Please help someone.
|
| Author |
Message |
TSandberg

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 12:03:02 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
premium.
i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
that.
i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
the 2 processors and use them.
so i decided to call MS directly.
the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
that didn't help...
so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
would help me resolve the issue.
1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
3. he tried uninstalling the processors
4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
manager.
but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
great under XP pro by the way...]
i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
is not the issue.
I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
should home premium see the second processor?
thanks for advice..
dave
Windows Vista38
|
| |
|
| |
 |
MyronH

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 12:03:02 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
According the Microsofts documentation on the various versions, Home and
Premium will support multi core (dual core, quad core) but will not support
dual processors. This may have been the confusion you encountered with the
(lack of) tech support you talked to. Business, Ultimate, and Enterprise
will support dual processors.
Hope this help and sorry for the bad news.
--
Myron
"EMail@HideDomain.com" wrote:
> OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
> business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
> premium.
>
> i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
> i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
> that.
> i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
> in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
>
> so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
> the 2 processors and use them.
>
> so i decided to call MS directly.
>
> the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
> that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
> that didn't help...
>
> so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
> that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
> would help me resolve the issue.
>
> 1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
> 2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
> the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
> 3. he tried uninstalling the processors
> 4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
> up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
> graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
> processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
> manager.
> but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
> illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
> 5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
> 6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
> problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
> great under XP pro by the way...]
>
> i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
> processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
> is not the issue.
>
> I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
> upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
> speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
>
> i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
>
> so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
> should home premium see the second processor?
>
> thanks for advice..
>
> dave
>
|
| |
|
| |
 |
AJR

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 12:09:43 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
First - Vista Home Premium DOES NOT support multiple (meaning two)
processsors - support begins with Vista Business version.
All Vista versions support "MULTI_CORE"
(not same as multiple processsors) processsors.
Problem of semantics!
<EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
> OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
> business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
> premium.
>
> i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
> i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
> that.
> i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
> in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
>
> so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
> the 2 processors and use them.
>
> so i decided to call MS directly.
>
> the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
> that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
> that didn't help...
>
> so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
> that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
> would help me resolve the issue.
>
> 1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
> 2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
> the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
> 3. he tried uninstalling the processors
> 4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
> up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
> graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
> processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
> manager.
> but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
> illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
> 5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
> 6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
> problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
> great under XP pro by the way...]
>
> i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
> processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
> is not the issue.
>
> I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
> upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
> speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
>
> i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
>
> so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
> should home premium see the second processor?
>
> thanks for advice..
>
> dave
|
| |
|
| |
 |
wrat

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 12:27:58 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
In article <EMail@HideDomain.com>,
AJR <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote:
>
>All Vista versions support "MULTI_CORE"
When Windows blue screens on that kind of system do you
get multi core dumps? Or still just one?
|
| |
|
| |
 |
rtdavide

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 13:01:16 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
On Feb 8, 12:09=A0pm, "AJR" <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote:
> First - Vista Home Premium DOES NOT support multiple (meaning two)
> processsors - support begins with Vista Business version.
>
> All Vista versions support "MULTI_CORE"
> (not same as multiple processsors) processsors.
>
> Problem of semantics!
>
> <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
>
> news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
>
>
>
> > OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
> > business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
> > premium.
>
> > i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
> > i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
> > that.
> > i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
> > in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
>
> > so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
> > the 2 processors and use them.
>
> > so i decided to call MS directly.
>
> > the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
> > that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
> > that didn't help...
>
> > so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
> > that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
> > would help me resolve the issue.
>
> > 1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
> > 2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
> > the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
> > 3. he tried uninstalling the processors
> > 4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
> > up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
> > graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
> > processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
> > manager.
> > but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
> > illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
> > 5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
> > 6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
> > problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
> > great under XP pro by the way...]
>
> > i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
> > processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
> > is not the issue.
>
> > I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
> > upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
> > speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
>
> > i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
>
> > so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
> > should home premium see the second processor?
>
> > thanks for advice..
>
> > dave- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
unfortunately, given the level of knowledge the techs had about my
computer, and my repeated questions about two physical processors, i
think it's obvious they simply didn't know. i was very specific about
it not being a single multi core processor, but 2 separate physical
processors...
i just got a call back from the tech, and he told me after checking
that it is correct... only ultimate, business and enterprise will
support dual processors.
i wish he would have figured that out before he had me do all this
other stuff....
|
| |
|
| |
 |
Richard

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 13:39:23 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
Any version of Vista will install on a multiprocessor or multicore system.
The difference is that they all support multiple cores on a single physical
processor but only the Business and Ultimate editions will support multiple
physical processors. A Home version of Vista will install fine on a
multiple physical processor system but it will only use the first physical
processor present.
--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] EMail@HideDomain.com
* NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/
<EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
> OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
> business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
> premium.
>
> i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
> i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
> that.
> i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
> in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
>
> so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
> the 2 processors and use them.
>
> so i decided to call MS directly.
>
> the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
> that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
> that didn't help...
>
> so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
> that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
> would help me resolve the issue.
>
> 1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
> 2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
> the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
> 3. he tried uninstalling the processors
> 4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
> up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
> graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
> processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
> manager.
> but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
> illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
> 5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
> 6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
> problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
> great under XP pro by the way...]
>
> i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
> processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
> is not the issue.
>
> I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
> upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
> speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
>
> i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
>
> so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
> should home premium see the second processor?
>
> thanks for advice..
>
> dave
|
| |
|
| |
 |
rtdavide

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 13:50:18 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
On Feb 8, 1:39=A0pm, "Richard G. Harper" <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote:
> Any version of Vista will install on a multiprocessor or multicore system.=
> The difference is that they all support multiple cores on a single physica=
l
> processor but only the Business and Ultimate editions will support multipl=
e
> physical processors. =A0A Home version of Vista will install fine on a
> multiple physical processor system but it will only use the first physical=
> processor present.
>
> --
> Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] =EMail@HideDomain.com
> * NEW! Catch my blog ...http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
> * The Website -http://rgharper.mvps.org/
>
> <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
>
> news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
>
>
>
> > OK, i have seen some posts on this group to the effect that vista
> > business and ultimate will support multi processors, but not home
> > premium.
>
> > i have a dual processor setup 2 athlon MP 1800's and 2 gigs RAM
> > i didn't know that home premium would not support it, so i bought
> > that.
> > i have just recently figured out that while you can see 2 processors
> > in the device manager, only one seems to be actually processing data.
>
> > so i am willing to upgrade to ultimate, providing it will actually see
> > the 2 processors and use them.
>
> > so i decided to call MS directly.
>
> > the first call was routed to a sales rep who read the EULA stating
> > that i could legally install the copy on a device with 1-2 processors.
> > that didn't help...
>
> > so i went back through and got transferred to a tech ... in india...
> > that assured me home premium should be able to see both, and they
> > would help me resolve the issue.
>
> > 1. he tried updating the drivers, that didn't work
> > 2. he tried adding the second processor through a regedit, by copying
> > the contents of the first folder... that didn't work either....
> > 3. he tried uninstalling the processors
> > 4. he tried telling me the reason the second processor wasn't showing
> > up was because it would show until the system needed it.. like under a
> > graphic intense situation... this despite the fact that the one
> > processor showing was pegged at 100% usage just opening the task
> > manager.
> > but it also happens that i do graphics, so i opened photoshop and
> > illustrator and the task manager, and still no second processor
> > 5. he is now having me reinstall vista...
> > 6. he is telling me if that doesn't work, that it isn't a windows
> > problem but some issue with the motherboard.. a setting... [it worked
> > great under XP pro by the way...]
>
> > i have repeatedly asked if home premium really supports the two
> > processors and he has repeatedly told me that he has checked and that
> > is not the issue.
>
> > I would gladly pay [well, maybe not gladly, but i'd do it ...] for the
> > upgrade to ultimate if it will utilize the second processor and so
> > speed up some things that are completely bogged down, BUT....
>
> > i don't want to bother paying for ultimate if it won't help.
>
> > so... will vista ultimate see and use the second processor?
> > should home premium see the second processor?
>
> > thanks for advice..
>
> > dave- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
i know that now... but the problem as i see it is that i called MS
directly about this and was told wrongly that home premium should
work... and then spent 2 hours on the phone to india while the tech
tried to make it do something it was simply not going to do: recognize
the second processor.
i'm now about 2 hours into a reinstall of windows that was
unnecessary.. so that is 4 hours down the toilet for asking MS tech
support something i'd have thought they should have known straight up.
and given that i outlined the problem in no uncertain terms, and
repeatedly asked about it during all the different attempts, it's kind
of ...well no.. VERY frustrating to have squandered all the time.
now i'm supposed to wait until it's all done, who knows how much
longer, back up all the data, and then do a clean install again...
this time without giving the product key and claiming my version is
ultimate.
then it is supposed to install ultimate and i can check and see if the
2 processors show up.. if they do, then they will hook me up with a
new key upgrade.
but i feel like i really got kicked here for calling directly to
microsoft to get an answer
why wouldn't their techs know the answer to something like this?
|
| |
|
| |
 |
wrat

|
Posted: Fri Feb 08 14:33:49 PST 2008 |
Top |
Windows Vista >> vista and 2 physical processors
In article <EMail@HideDomain.com>,
Richard G. Harper <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote:
>
>. A Home version of Vista will install fine on a
>multiple physical processor system but it will only use the first physical
>processor present.
>
Can't you just install it twice?
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
 |
Index ‹ Windows Vista ‹ Windows Vista |
- Next
- 1
- Windows Vista >> Windows Vista Fast User SwitchingI have 3 people using my PC and all of them have their own accounts.
When you press WINKEY + L your session gets locked and your back at
the login screen. In windows XP pressing this showed all users, in
vista you then need to click 'switch user' to see all users. Is it
possible to make vista act the same way?
- 2
- Windows Vista >> Vista and Media playerI have a problem with my new PC (Dell Dimension 690) with a Core 2
Quad E5335 processor, 2 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD
When I use Media Player 11 sometimes the sound stops for 0.5-3 sec.
This seems to be due to searchindexer.exe writing to the HDD. If I
disable Windows Search I don't have the problems. But I don't really
like doing so.
Anyone else experienced the same problem, or could something be wrong
with my machine?
- 3
- Windows Vista >> MS - Vista OfficeI was told to post my question here by another newsgroup.
I have several new users running Vista. They can access items on our local
server, AutoCAD, pdf's etc... but can only access word and excel items as
read only. They have full rights to the folders and files, and a few of the
files were orginially create by the same user in XP.
It says read only and cannot change anything on the docs, and excel sheets
without having to rename them first.
--
Dave
- 4
- Windows Vista >> Windows Movie Maker problemI have a relatively old (but working) movie recorder which records in
MP4 format.
It plays back fine on my PC (with the Klite codec pack installed -
otherwise it doesn't) but whenever I try to upload any video to
YouTube or edit it in Movie Maker, the picture is mis-aligned.
I seem to only get the top left-hand section of the original video.
It's like the recording has zoomed to the top left-hand quarter/third
- which obviously ruins the recording.
The original if fine (I see the whole picture) but whenever I try to
do anything with the video, I get this weaird effect.
I appreciate that the MP4 format is a nightmare but this is really
strange.
Any ideas? Or can anyone recommend another video editing programme
that can output in different formats?
Thanks.
Bobby
- 5
- Windows Vista >> "Scroll Bar" Icon?Using a new Gateway T-1610 with Windows Vista. Have never used Vista before.
Don't know if this is a Gateway question or Windows, but thought I'd try
here. As I move the pointer around using the touchpad, a little icon that
looks like a very small scrollbar (about 1/4") pops up and disappears
constantly. I can't figure out what it does or how to use it. Can't find a
refernce to it in the Gateway PDF user guide (probably because I don't know
what it's called). Can anyone help? Silly question, I know. Thanks!
--
Susan/San Francisco
- 6
- Windows Vista >> VISTA IS ScrewedI've been running Vista for more than a yr and I'm giving up and going
back to XP. I've got some serious hardware and the product still
blows.
I've been thinking about what is so good about Vista?
It does look better.
It does not crash as often.
MS claims the security is better, but I find it so intrusive that I
view the new "security" as a big negative. Hell I can buy the best AV
and firewall products on the market for XP and be a whole lot happier.
That is about it for the good list.
The bad........
Sometimes without explaination, files can not be deleted due to
"security" even if you are a admin. Sometimes they appear to be
deleted but come back, at least until you reboot. This is pretty
scary stuff for an "enterprise" OS.
Copying large amounts of data takes forever, sometimes so long that
the time remaining is infinite. How could MS mess up basic file
manager activities so badly?
Way too many third party products a year into this gig still do not
support Vista or claim to, but don't work as well as they do on XP.
Vista is slower than XP.
What real tipped the scale was Vista SP1 vrs XP SP3. Not sure why MS
did that, but now a better product, XP, has improved more than Vista
as SP1 falls way short. i.e. the gap between XP SP3 and Vista SP1 is
greater than XP SP2 and Vista.
If there was ever a time that for a new OS to enter the market, this
is it. MS has become the dinosaur.
- 7
- Windows Vista >> Vista compatibility with XPI have a new PC with Windows Vista installed. However, I work from home with
an organisation which has several employees who use Windows XP and Word 97
and they are having trouble opening my documents
I know I can save individual docs by saving as Word 97-2003 compatible, but
having to remember to do this every time is becoming a nuisance.
Can I set my computer to default to this method of saving docs everytime?
- 8
- Windows Vista >> new updates installing and restarting computer... without warningYeah I was in the middle of a game on my laptop that has the new Windows
Vista on it when the game just shut down, then the computer restarted because
of new updates that were installed, causing a loss of information. what
moron came up with the idea to have the computer download and then restart
without warning and without giving the user time to save their data? That
makes the list of the dumbest ideas ever. Only an idiot would think that was
a good idea. I mean to run any program or do anything or download anything I
am bombarded with questions about whether I am the one wanting to do that,
but yet this happens, without warning, causing me to lose a lot. I am just
glad I wasn't in the middle of writing my thesis when this happened or else I
would really be pissed at likely having lost a lot of work. The idiot who
thought of this idea needs to be fired, and the idiot that hired him or her
needs to be fired. The idiot that should have caught such a stupid idea
should be fired. Why would anyone want such a thing on their computer? I can
see why so many people are downgrading back to XP. With such morons in the
company, its a wonder Microsoft hasn't been run into run into the ground.
What great idea do you have next? A computer that shocks its users
constantly? Or one that every other day deletes any and all files the user
has on it? That seems to be the tracks these idiots are on.
- 9
- Windows Vista >> windows media player 11Hello, I am running vista business, windows media player 11.
When playing a video file that has the wrong codec, a red X would display on
the right ride of media player in which I could click on and it would take me
to the web to find the codec, I inadvertently must have clicked "donot
display this" and cannot get the information to display on the side of media
player...
any thoughts?
thanks in advance
- 10
- Windows Vista >> Microsoft Communities? News GroupsWhen I first started using Vista Windows Mail, I think I had (in the
left-hand pane of Windows Mail) "Local Folders" for mail and "Usenet News"
and "Microsoft Communities" for news groups. I'm not sure what the Microsoft
group was called but I deleted it as I thought I probably would never use
it. Is there a way to get it back as I am curious to see what was available
there?
- 11
- Windows Vista >> How do I remove Vista from a partition?To make sure Vista would work with all my hardware and programs, I created a
second partition on my XP machine and installed Vista on there (Vista Home
Premium). All my hardware and my important programs worked so I thought I'd
bite the bullet and upgrade my XP installation on the first partition. That
also worked OK (apart from losing all my Music and Videos which I am
restoring from backup, at present) and I have used EasyBCD to remove the
entry for the copy of Vista on my second partition but I can't seem to delete
all the directories and files that are on there. It says I don't have
permission to many of them. I also keep Norton Ghost backups on that
partition so I don't really want to format it. As I am logged on as an
Administrator, why don't I have access to everything? What can I do to allow
myself to delete all the Windows files and directories?
- 12
- Windows Vista >> Re: A little confusedconfused Mike says Do windows users regularly harass the linux news groups?
You do not see the harassing posts if you effectively learn to use your "kill file" feature in the news reader that you use. It should have one, use it.
Mike Hall "Malicious Various People" says No, they don't..
Correct, as he uses a kill file.
norm says Yes, they do. He does not use a file kill as he does not know how to use it.
This post was made using Vista with no special software or word processor.
It takes a while to learn to use. Learn to use the Tabs feature and use multiple windows that you can move from one to the other while you are working.In one window tab I am playing poker making money on line. All the sites offer free money.I have driven $500 to $7500 in three weeks all using Vista.The gaming software works on it. On one I have an on-line spell checker and one of the others I have the newsgroup reader in this case Go ogle and in one I have a on line Use net poster.
Vista is a new O/S and sure it has problems but it is the wave of the Future and will get better with age.It is better then XP as it has more security features.Read this newsgroup you will learn more. The so called harassing posts are just one or two trolls. Ignore.
- 13
- Windows Vista >> windows live messengerCan't get live messenger to work with vista on dell computer.error81000306.it
works on a laptop I have. Have disabled firewalls etc. Only differance
between computers is ones runing vista home premium others vista business.
Can this problem be resolved.
- 14
- Windows Vista >> TCP/IP Problems!!!We have built quite a few systems running Windows Vista Business. After the
OS installation and updates, the computer is not getting an IP address from
the router. It is getting the non-routable 169.........address. It is not
all of the systems, just a few. We have tried to no avail solving this
problem, and end up formatting and starting over; a client has called saying
he cannot get to the Internet with his new computer. I asked him to check
his IP address and it was the 169........ When the computer left the shop
it was connecting to the Internet just fine.
We are really frustrated!!! Is this a VISTA problem, and update problem or
????
Thanf you for your help in advance!!
Candace Sparks
- 15
- Windows Vista >> Coming Along With Vista And SP1Since I Had To Get Rid Of Ubuntu On My Computers Because Ubuntu Was Just
Plain Stupid, I Installed Vista And Vista With SP1 And It Works Fine. Just
FYI.
Ubuntu Is A Dumb Thing To Install On Any Computer. Just FYI. Ubuntu Has A
Small Market Share So Being Free It Is Worth Nothing To Me And My Dad Who
Was A Janitor. Just FYI.
Vista Allows Me The Freedom Of Using Office. Just FYI
|
|
|