On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:27:44 -0400, "Charlie" <
Charlie@nowhere.com>
wrote:
Quote
I have been reading this newsgroup for several months now and it appears
that Vista seems to work very well for some and not for others.
That's a fair, unbiased observation.
Quote
What I haven't been able to determine is just how bad /good is Vista. Are the
people that are having problems making the most noise? Are the people that
are not having problems just not saying anything?
It is long established fact that those not having problems rarely
comment in newsgroups or forums just like people don't visit their
doctor just to stop by and say Hi Doc, I'm feeling fine, thought you
would like to know. It is also established for every poster
complaining that works out to roughly 100 others having the same or
similar problem that don't bother to report it. This newsgroup is a
lot of things, but to attempt to use it as a yardstick for how people
feel about Vista or their experience with it is foolish. Most people
using Vista never heard of this newsgroup or other newsgroups for that
matter.
Today's computer and it's hardware and software combination can have
almost infinite variations. Accordingly some, especially those that
hardly use their computer or never get beyond simple tasks like
reading email, surfing the web or doing some trivial tasks like typing
something in a word processor or entering a few figures in a
spreadsheet are hardly qualified to rank a operating system or any
particular system configuration because for starters they don't know
what to look for to know if it is as good as it should be. The often
repeated slow file transfer issue, a KNOWN bug Microsoft admits to is
a classic example. Some people may wonder why it takes so long to copy
move files, but not having anything else to compare it to just blow it
off as normal behavior while someone more experienced KNOWS Vista
sucks at file copying/moving. Not on everyone's system, but enough of
a problem Microsoft rushed out a hotfix back in May and surely will
improve on it further in SP1.
The point is you wouldn't ask your 80 year old grandma to go to the
Indy 500 race track and jump in one of those high powered race cars
and then report back how well it performs after she made a single
circuit of the track at 30 MPH would you? No? Then why or why do
people listen to clueless fanboys who pretend to be experts on Vista
when in fact most are at best casual users?
Quote
I remembered that Newegg.com lets people post reviews about the products
they purchase on their web site. For a non-bias opinion I went to Newegg's
site and read some reviews people posted on the Vista operating systems.
Hold on. Such reviews are VERY biased. Just one person ranting about a
problem can distort the results if there aren't many reviews and it
could be due to something really dumb they did. The flip side is
people using their computer a couple hours a week tops and raving how
great it is are hardly experts and lack the technical knowledge to
make any informed opinions. Read my grandma analogy again.
Quote
Here is one example posted for OEM 32 bit Vista Home Premium. I chose this
product because it had the most reviews (477) posted. The other versions of
Vista were very similar to Home Premium.
Excellent/Good - 71%
Average - 12%
Poor/Very Poor - 17%
There you have it. Draw your own conclusions.
OK, looking at your survey nearly 1 out 5 rank Vista as poor to very
poor. That's hardly a ringing endorsement for a mature product (which
Windows is) it has been around for 21 years in one form or another.
Accordingly Microsoft should have learned from it's past mistakes and
redoubled their efforts to ship a product more free of bugs. They
haven't. That's a knock fanboys can't deny or shake.
Microsoft ALWAYS releases the latest version of Windows far behind
schedule, removes a lot of features there were promised in early press
releases and may have even been in early beta releases and then admits
they shipped a version to customers they knew had issues.
I have a simple question. Why should Microsoft's customers accept
should poor performance? Microsoft being the biggest software
developer in the world we should expect more, not less. Especially in
quality control. It is exactly because of idiots like Frank that
tirelessly wave the Microsoft flag and pretend how great their junk is
that Microsoft sees that good enough is good enough and never really
try harder since they see customers accepting pretty good as good
enough. I keep asking why?
-