Board index » Windows Vista » Should I use ReadyBoost?
|
Bhupendra
|
|
Bhupendra
|
Should I use ReadyBoost?
Windows Vista31
I have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance boost if I use ReadyBoost? I have a built-in memory card slot that I never use, and I wonder if I should buy a ReadyBoost-capable card, stick it in there and use it to boost my computer. I use Home Premium and 2 GB was recommended, but will 2 or 4 GB available for ReadyBoost help me? - |
| groovy
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 10:01:08 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
you wont see almost any difference, you can get another 2 gigs ram, although
your system if its 32 bit will only use 3.1 - 3.5 of that "Ernie Lane" <ErnieLane@verizon.net>wrote in message QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance boost - |
| Charlie42
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 10:09:00 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
"Ernie Lane" <ErnieLane@verizon.net>wrote:
QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance boost difference. I believe ReadyBoost was made for computers pushed to their limits by Vista, ie. computers with 512MB or 1GB RAM and a slow, traditional, single core processor. Unless you frequently run particularly resource hogging software, I doubt you will benefit from ReadyBoost. Anyway, if you intend to use a memory card for ReadyBoost only, why not just add more RAM? It is relatively inexpensive. Charlie42 - |
| John
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 11:47:14 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
You are not going to see any improvement using Ready Boost. Ready boost is
fine for machines hat have between 512MB and 1GB of memory (that is what it was designed for). If you have 2GB or more any improvement would be so slight that it would not be noticeable. -- -- John Barnett MVP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: xphelpandsupport.mvps.org" >xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: vistasupport.mvps.org" >vistasupport.mvps.org The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Ernie Lane" <ErnieLane@verizon.net>wrote in message QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance boost |
| Ken
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 12:22:48 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:57:38 GMT, Ernie Lane <ErnieLane@verizon.net>
wrote: QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance In my experience, no. ReadyBoost helps only on computers with less than 2GB of RAM. And since my recommendation is that any Vista computer with less than 2GB should be upgraded to at least 2GB, I think ReadyBoost is essentially useless. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup - |
| RalfG
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 12:49:08 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
Had the same thought once. Not all memory card readers are USB2 so
Readyboost might not be available on the reader. See about testing it before spending money on a high speed memory card. "Ernie Lane" <ErnieLane@verizon.net>wrote in message QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performance boost |
| Joe
Registered User |
Mon Apr 07 20:32:10 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?Ernie Lane;675544 Wrote: QuoteI have a laptop with Vista, 2 GB RAM. Should I expect a performanc experienced something different with readyboost My boot up time has been cut in 1/2 and my shut down time is also a least 33% faster. Some applications are appearing to open and ru faster. My system has 1 X 4 GB DDR2 800 installed with a 4 GB readyboot US drive I've seen a measurable improvement by using readyboost. My .0 -- - |
| Synapse
Registered User |
Tue Apr 08 06:29:45 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
".Joe" <Joe.37j4t0@no-mx.forums.net>wrote in message
Quote
memory, and with 4GB, there is always going to be a lot for caching, unless you have a few large applications and files open. I think your perceived speed increases might be due to SuperFetch tuning up or maybe ongoing defragmentation. ss. - |
| John
Registered User |
Tue Apr 08 12:29:21 PDT 2008
Re:Should I use ReadyBoost?
It may also be due to the installation of SP1. I can't say I've noticed any
increase in speed when starting up or shutting down the machine but independent benchmark tests suggest that there is a 5 second gain on tart up and 2 second gain on shutdown (source: Windows Vista The Official Magazine (Future Publishing) issue 16: Page 41 -- -- John Barnett MVP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: xphelpandsupport.mvps.org" >xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: vistasupport.mvps.org" >vistasupport.mvps.org The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk>wrote in message Quote".Joe" <Joe.37j4t0@no-mx.forums.net>wrote in message |
