Board index » Visual Studio » food components compatibility question

Visual Studio183
Dear Wisdom,

could anyone give an idea of where to look for information about food

ingridients compatability ?



Thanks for any advice!

Gnum


-

Gnum wrote:

Certainly not in a C++ programming newsgroup.



-cd





-

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:02:48 -0800, "Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]"

<cpdaniel_remove_this_and_nospam@mvps.org.nospam>wrote:



Foo usually goes well with bar, unless they are incompatible types.



Quux and baz are a good combo too, but more difficult to locate, at

least in the US.



--

Sev

-

"Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]"

<cpdaniel_remove_this_and_nospam@mvps.org.nospam>wrote in message

Must ... resist ... a bad joke involving 0xBAADFOOD or 0xDEADBEEF

--

With best wishes,

Igor Tandetnik



With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not

necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to

land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly

overhead. -- RFC 1925





-

Do you really think so ?



What about any of following :



<------ list of 90% of headers from this group ----->



Most of questions asked and answered here have absolutely nothing to do with

C++ language.

As we discussed with William it does not really matter how tight it is

related to C++ language itself as this newsgroup is only supposed to be

friendly and not moderated.



So far what's wrong with my question?



Say I am working on development of food-related programm which is being

written by me on excactly VC++. Is this relation not good enough ? Is any

worse then GDI and windows messaging questions in terms of C++ language ?



Cheers!

Gnum



"Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]" <cpdaniel_remove_this_and_nospam@mvps.org.nospam>

wrote in message news:%23D724J7EFHA.2564@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...



-

microsoft.public.food.component



"Gnum" <alexander_dot_lavrinovich_at_provenco_dot_com>wrote in message



-

"Severian" <severian@chlamydia-is-not-a-flower.com>wrote in message

Fortunately I am not in US. It's bit easier in place where I am. Thank you

for good guess any way.



:)



Gnum





-

Ha-ha.



That was great example!

I do really like it. Nice Russian sense of humor !



Never would be confused with anything else.





Cheers!

Gnum





"Igor Tandetnik" <itandetnik@mvps.org>wrote in message



-

"Gnum" <alexander_dot_lavrinovich_at_provenco_dot_com>wrote in message

That's b.s. and and a gross oversimplification of what I said.



It's also quite amusing to see you to adopt a behavior for yourself which

you criticize in others. It is just so _typically_ USENET. <BSEG>



Regards,

Will





-

"Gnum" <alexander_dot_lavrinovich_at_provenco_dot_com>wrote in message

Mainly the fact that a person who might actually know the answer is

unlikely to frequent this group. Note that you have not been flamed to

embers by an angry mob within minutes of your post - this is what makes

this group friendlier than many others. But a chance of a meaningful

discussion of your particular problem is very low, simply because this

group attracts people with a different area of expertise.



I used to work for a railroad company - shall we discuss the intricacies

of building train schedules? I also once developed modelling software

for oil production, so let's talk about how rock porosity affects well

yields. The fact that I'm a programmer does not mean I have to know

everything one might develop a program for. The fact that this group is

about programming does not mean it is reasonable to ask questions about

anything one might develop a program for - at least not if you actually

expect a meaningful answer.



As to your specific question, consider asking in sci.bio.food-science .

I suspect you'll run a much higher chance of finding someone there who

actually knows what you are talking about.

--

With best wishes,

Igor Tandetnik



With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not

necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to

land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly

overhead. -- RFC 1925





-