Board index » Visual Studio » 70-292 Passed!

Visual Studio225
On the 4th I got a 646 on 70-292. That was my first failure after doing 7 for

7 for my MCSE 2000. Today I retook it and got an 888. Now onto 70-296 to

finish up my MCSE 2003.



-------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Retiree

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2000

MCSE on Windows 2000


-

"TBackstrom" <TBackstrom@discussions.microsoft.com>wrote in message

blew his chance at 32 for 32.





-

did you hear "=?Utf-8?B?VEJhY2tzdHJvbQ==?="

<TBackstrom@discussions.microsoft.com>say in



congrats on the pass



--

The InterNeil MCNGP#30



- Remember, you're unique. Just like everybody else.

-

Well Done with the pass!



I'm to take the exam in 3 days!



How many questions did you get?.... Did you get many on DNS?





"Neil" wrote:

Hi minime,



It was 40 questions in 120 minutes. And a high proportion of Terminal

Services and DNS questions. Be sure you know the nitty gritty of the

material. It is a tough one.



------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Retiree

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2000

MCSE on Windows 2000







"minime" wrote:

I've just come back from the test centre, Failed with 498!..It's a tough

cookie! Terminal Services, SUS, and DNS are the topic's of subject in this

exam... quite a few were drag and drop questions...



Oh well... I'm gonna do them individually now, starting with 70-290 in a few

weeks time.



"TBackstrom" wrote:

Agreed! It is a tough exam. What's funny is I've been reading the MCSE

upgrade exam, 70-296, isn't nearly as bad.



------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Retiree

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2003

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2000

MCSE on Windows 2000







"minime" wrote:

From what I've heard from people who have sat both 292 and 296 (Instructors

and the like) say that 296 is alot easier than 292, although as I'm not an

MCSE 2000 I wont be sitting that one!



Looks like 292 is the 'beast' as it were (for the upgrader's anyhow)...

something like 216 on the 2000 track...



Anyways, onwards on upwards I suppose, As I said earlier, I'm just gonna do

290 and 291 to get my MCSA 2k3 that way...



Anyways good look with 296, Im gonna start studying for 290 now, Out of

intrest Have you heard any comments \ difficulty of 290?





"TBackstrom" wrote:

By the comments in the MCP magaizine review of 70-290, sounds like it's a

bear also.

http://mcpmag.com/reviews/exams/article.asp?EditorialsID" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">mcpmag.com/reviews/exams/article.asp=101



-------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Retiree

MCSE on Windows 2000

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2003

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2000









"minime" wrote:

Thanks for the link,A nice review ....Oh well, I will give it a whirl, at

least I have some experience on the new testing technique after sitting 292

today..What a change from the 2000 track exams! Suppose its a way of making

sure youv'e had hands on experience of Windows 2003! hands on experience did

it for me on the MCSA 2000 track anyway..



"TBackstrom" wrote:

You're welcome. Good luck on 70-290. I know Microsoft is trying to make their

certs more reflective of real world experience, and get away from "paper

certs", but the areas they seem to be focusing the exam questions on doesn't

seem to be hitting the mark.



-------------------------------------------

U.S. Air Force Retiree

MCSE on Windows 2000

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2003

MCSA: Messaging on Windows 2000









"minime" wrote:

Congrats from a fellow tech on the MCSE path

--

MCSA is just the beginning...





"TBackstrom" wrote: