| Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24) |
|
 |
Index ‹ Windows OS ‹ WindowsMe
|
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- WindowsMe >> Cannot Un-Check "Mute All" Checkbox in sound properties........I posted this earlier in this ng with no reply, I'm hoping someone can
help me out here. The original post was:
In the volume control dialog box(es) in Windows ME, I cannot un-check
the "Mute All" checkbox, the speaker icon in the taskbar is red-slashed
out, and there is no sound.
All appears okay in Task Mangler, yet there is no sound. This has
happened before, and I fixed it by running system restore, but I would
like to find out if there is a better, more specific fix I could try.
Any ideas, anyone? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks, all...
Mark Mestman
Guitarmakerm...@yahoo
- 3
- WindowsServer >> spoolsv.exei want write one batch to restart daily the spoolsv.exe with "system" as
user. It's possible? How can i do it.
thanks
Kader
- 4
- WindowsMe >> Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB905915)Microsoft released yesterday, 13 December (patch Tuesday), a Cumulative
Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB905915). May I
urge al users of Win Me (or come to that any other MS operating system) to
update their system as a matter of urgency as this hotfix addresses a
number of vulnerabilities some of which are already being exploited.
For more details see KB905915 - "MS05-054: Cumulative security update for
Internet Explorer" (http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=905915) and also
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-054
(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-054.mspx).
--
Mike Maltby
mike.maltby@gmail.com
- 5
- Directory >> some machines can't login into domain - HELP!I came into work this morning to find that a whole lot of users are
unable to log into the domain. The machines are just hanging on the
'Applying Computer Settings'.
Its strange, because its Win2k Machines and XP machines that have
these symptoms.
When I unplug the network on the a machine that is having trouble
logging in, it boots up normally and logs in fine.
On one of my domain controllers I'm getting the following error:
Windows cannot access the registry information at
\\spud.com\sysvol\spud.com\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\Machine\registry.pol
with (53).
Any ideas?
Any help would be great.
- 6
- 7
- win2000 >> DVD writerI just want to know whether Windows 2000 server support USB External DVD
Writer?
Thanks in advance
- 8
- Security >> Looking for a tool or utility to crack password?We are trying to educate our users the importance of using complex password
and i am looking for a utility or any software available on the market to
demonstrate to them how easy to crack their password if using simple
password. They will just enter their password and it will show how fast it is
decoded. The utilty is not intented to run against the domain logon account.
They will just key in their password and the tool will either shows how
quick it is easily cracked because it is not complex.
Appreciate if you know the avaiability of such tool. Thks
- 9
- active directory >> NT4 to 2003 Active DirectoryOne of the domains that I'm responsible for is still running NT4. Since I'm
unable to decommission it, I'd like to at least upgrade it to Server 2003
SP2 / Active Directory. I have a new PDC with a 7.8GB system partition that
is ready for the upgrade and a new box which will also only have 2003
installed and promoted after the upgrade. All remaining NT4 boxes will be
decommissioned following the upgrade.
DNS & WINS are ran on appliances, not on the domain controllers. Does
anything need done on the client side, since the boxes are joined to
'DOMAIN' vs. 'domain.com'? Or will WINS act as a crutch in this scenario?
Also, is this safe to perform during the day since the BDCs will be up and
authenticating users? I was thinking of leaving one BDC off during the
upgrade to provide a rollback plan, if necessary.
Any help is appreciated.
--
Tim
- 10
- Drivers >> OffloadChecksum Test In NDIS 6.5Hi!
My understanding of how protocols/IM drivers parse indicated rx NBLs/NBs is
by accessing the data starting at NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL(NB) and offset by
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB).
Our miniport driver will occasionally shift the offset within the
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL(NB) and will set NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB)
appropriately. Unfortunately, the NDIS 6.5 offloadchecksum test fails and
reports data corruption because it is not taking the
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB) into consideration. I have verified this
by looking at the MDL it reports as containing corrupted data. In all cases,
the test is looking at data at MDL->MappedSystemVa without offsetting this
by the NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET.
Note that this is the only test that fails. All other tests, such as
offloadlso, works.
Is this a known problem with the NDIS 6.2/NDIS.Net that comes with DTM 1.2?
Thanks!
- 11
- WindowsMe >> Windows Me Hangs on boot upPer the Dell support people, I was told I have the LovSan
virus, however, reading through this message board, I'm
seeing someone had the problem I'm having well before this
(posted 8/3 at 5:36 pm), but no one posted a solution.
Any thoughts? (Though I also installed a game a week
before it worked fine in the meantime.) Let me know if
any other info would be helpful. Thanks!!
DKP - text of previous post added:
My friend has Windows ME on his computer and recently he
installed a game program on it. After restarting the
computer it gets stuck on the screen which shows the
Windows ME logo. The light blue bar at the bottom of the
screen keeps scrolling to the right, so it seems the
computer is not hung. But it does not go on any further
and just stays on this screen forever.
Be booted off a floppy to a DOS prompt and
ran 'scandisk /all' and 'scanreg /restore', but it did
not help.
I've never seen this problem before and there is no error
message, so Im not sure what to do next. We are
considering reinstall the OS again, but would like to
avoid it if possible. Would appreciate it if you can
help. Thanks.
Omar
.
- 12
- WindowsMe >> ME getting very slowI have noticed a considerable slowing down of almost all operations
during the past month or so. This is especially noticeable when surfing.
Pages open slowly and even after they open (and status bar says "done")
the cursor remains a thin line and I cannot scroll down. After several
seconds, the cursor pops back to its original arrow shape and I can
scroll. It is getting to be very unpleasant to surf.
I have trimmed my startup programs, run Adware, Spybot, Scandisk, Defrag.
My resources right now read 44%. I am running FireFox 5.1, McAffee,
ZoneAlarm, and SpyBlaster. I use a dialup connection (and there is no
parallel problem with my other computer, running the same programs on XP
Pro, with the same dialup connection).
I don't know if this is a resources problem or what? Not too much more I
can deselect from the startup.
Any ideas appreciated.
Richard, Moving through Molasses
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Security >> Getting certificate context propertiesHi all,
I am developing a small app in C++ and I need to list all the certificates
in the system store, in a List View, like the one displayed in the
CryptUIDlgSelectCertificateFromStore() dialog. I have successfully
enumerated all the certificates using CertEnumCertificatesInStore() but I
can't seem to extract all the bits of information from the certificate
context, i.e. Issued to, Issued by, Intended purposes, Friendly name,
Expiration date and Location. The only pieces of information I have been
able to get so far using CertGetCertificateContextProperty() and
CertGetNameString() is the Issued to, Issued by and Friendly name.
Can anyone tell me how to get the remaining properties?
Kind Regards,
Chris
|
| Author |
Message |
tgriggs2005

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 13:58:22 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
2005-06-24
Dialer
+ Tango ++ TIBS
Hijacker
++ MoneyGainer ++ xxsware Inc. + ISearchTech.PowerScan +
ISearchTech.SideFind (9)
Keylogger
++ Dumaru
Malware
++ Adware.ZioCom.B ++ kz515.com + AzeSearch + ISearchTech.ISTsvc (22) +
ClimaxBucks.InternetOptimizer
This is a detections update. It does not correct the immunization issue
in Win9x.
Windows OS265
|
| |
|
| |
 |
webster72n

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 13:58:22 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
Thank you, Tom.
Any idea when it will be corrected, if ever?
Harry.
"TomV" <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
> 2005-06-24
> Dialer
> + Tango ++ TIBS
> Hijacker
> ++ MoneyGainer ++ xxsware Inc. + ISearchTech.PowerScan +
> ISearchTech.SideFind (9)
> Keylogger
> ++ Dumaru
> Malware
> ++ Adware.ZioCom.B ++ kz515.com + AzeSearch + ISearchTech.ISTsvc (22) +
> ClimaxBucks.InternetOptimizer
>
> This is a detections update. It does not correct the immunization issue
> in Win9x.
|
| |
|
| |
 |
TomV

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 14:31:24 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
Hi, Harry,
You're welcome. All I know is that a fix is in the works.
Tom
webster72n wrote:
> Thank you, Tom.
> Any idea when it will be corrected, if ever?
>
> Harry.
>
|
| |
|
| |
 |
webster72n

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 14:42:34 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
Tom:
Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
Is there a way to go back?
Harry.
"TomV" <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
> Hi, Harry,
>
> You're welcome. All I know is that a fix is in the works.
>
> Tom
>
> webster72n wrote:
> > Thank you, Tom.
> > Any idea when it will be corrected, if ever?
> >
> > Harry.
> >
|
| |
|
| |
 |
TomV

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 18:24:39 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
Harry,
This was an issue at one time in the previous version that was
ultimately resolved. I would recommend staying with the current
version. As you indicate, patience is a virtue.
Tom
webster72n wrote:
> Tom:
>
> Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
> The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
> Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
> Is there a way to go back?
>
> Harry.
>
|
| |
|
| |
 |
webster72n

|
Posted: Fri Jun 24 21:16:54 CDT 2005 |
Top |
WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)
Will do, Tom.
Thank you.
Harry.
"TomV" <EMail@HideDomain.com> wrote in message
news:EMail@HideDomain.com...
> Harry,
>
> This was an issue at one time in the previous version that was
> ultimately resolved. I would recommend staying with the current
> version. As you indicate, patience is a virtue.
>
> Tom
>
> webster72n wrote:
> > Tom:
> >
> > Patience is a virtue, I suppose, especially in this case.
> > The strange thing is, before I upgraded it worked allright.
> > Maybe I should have kept the previous version.
> > Is there a way to go back?
> >
> > Harry.
> >
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
 |
Index ‹ Windows OS ‹ WindowsMe |
- Next
- 1
- 2
- WindowsMe >> Networking / WorkgroupsWindows ME
I am trying to remove a workgroup from a PC. I am unaware of when it was
created or by whom in the family. There are no workgroups and no network.
This is a standalone PC. How do I remove this "MShome" group?
- 3
- win2000 >> Help! returns INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE when CreateFile() calledHi,
I written a win2k plug n play driver for pcmcia 16 bit PC card.From my
application I want to open a handle for our device. In my Application I
used SetupDi* functions to get the Device name. Later I called the
CreateFIle() function.
After calling SetupDi* functions finally I got Device interface
name in string variable
deviceInterfaceDetailData->DevicePath.
I called the above string variable as first parameter in CreateFile()
function.
My Device Interface name string is
"\\?\pcmcia#apoorva_1553_pcmcia_card..-apollo_c.labs-77f7#1#{643e59f2-a018-=
=AD432c-87c3-9bfc-93b5bedc}"
HANDLE hndfpga;
CreateFile(deviceInterfaceDetailData->DevicePath,
GENERIC_READ|GENERIC_WRITE,0,NULL,OPEN_EXISTING,0,NULL);
If I call the above function Iam getting the return value as
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, With GetLastError() function Iam getting the
error code 50.which is nothing but,
"The Network Request is not supported".
What could be the reason? Any mistake is there in the above procedure
please correct it.
Or if any other methods are there to get a handle of a device please
guide me.=20
Thanks in Advance.=20
Mahi
- 4
- win2000 >> Safely Removing HardwareHave a couple Buslink USB external harddrives connected to
a server running Windows 2000 Server. Recently, whenever
one of those drives is connected, there is no "Safely
Remove Hardware" icon located in the system taskbar. If I
go into "Control Panel"->"Add/Remove Hardware" and then
use the wizard to "Uninstall/Unplug a device"-
>"Unplug/Eject a device", the device does not show up in
the window. However, if I go ahead and unplug the device
I get the usual warning stating "Unsafe Removal of Device"
and it lists the device name in the window. Why isn't the
device being recognized in the "Safely Remove Hardware"
window and how do I get it to recognize? I should
mention, when the drives are connected, they show up in
Windows Explorer like normal and they can be used normally.
- 5
- Security >> "logon as a service" and "logon as a batch job"Gurus,
I understand, in highly secure environments, where you have to in certain
situations have to give certain accounts the "logon as a service" right.
But how does one know when to also give that account the "logon as a batch
job" right?
--
Spin
- 6
- WindowsServer >> Secure RDP ?Does anyone know a good way of allowing a user to have access to a server
using RDP but NOT giving them full Admin permissions ?
I have a bit of software which a member of staff needs to use which is
server based which cannot be run on an end client. It has to be run on the
server.
I really don't want this person playing around [ for obvious reasons ] as I
know they will. I want to restrict access to the program and that only.
I would appreciate any advice on this.
- 7
- WindowsMe >> WinME OKNow that the Support is terminated, WinME seems to work better than ever
before, no need to *upgrade* anymore.
What say ye?
Harry.
- 8
- Directory >> Allocate storage area for a specific usershi all. i am a new user. i am using windows 2003 server R2. i am facing a
problem to allocate specific storage for a specific user. suppose there are 3
domain users in my domain. how can i allocate storge area(suppose 5GB for
each user from D drive from server computer). when the client(Domain users)
logon from their machine to server the storage area will visible in their
computer as like C,D,E. how can i do that?
- 9
- 10
- Security >> House Probes Threat Posed by SpywareApr 29, 7:50 PM (ET)
By MATTHEW DALY
WASHINGTON (AP) - It's the newest computer security
problem to attract the attention of Congress: spyware, or
software designed to collect computer users' personal data
without their knowledge.
Secretly piggybacking on downloaded Internet software,
spyware transmits information about computer usage and
generates pop-up advertisements and other annoyances. It
often is difficult to uninstall.
Little known a few years ago, spyware is now so common
that many consider it the biggest problem for Internet
users since spam.
Microsoft estimates spyware is responsible for half of all
PC crashes and warns that it has become a multimillion-
dollar support issue for computer makers, Internet service
providers and technicians.
In some cases, it makes a computer unusable.
A research lab in Washington state found one of its
computers "hijacked" by pop-up ads, to the point where "we
couldn't do anything," said Patrick Clapshaw, the lab's
director.
After a week of frustration and several visits by
technicians, the problem was eventually solved, but not
before causing at least $500 worth of lost data and
downtime.
Clapshaw, of Kirkland, Wash., calls spyware worse than
spam.
"To me, this is an aggressive computer takeover," he
said. "It's the difference between someone dropping fliers
on your front porch, or walking around your house
following you and annoying you."
Members of Congress are taking the threat seriously. At
least three bills have been introduced to address the
problem, with more likely to follow.
"There is no more pernicious, intrusive activity going on
in the Internet today" than spyware, said Rep. Joe Barton,
R-Texas, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee.
At a hearing Thursday before the panel's subcommittee on
commerce, trade and consumer protection, computer makers
and user groups urged Congress to address deceptive
behavior, rather than ban categories of software. Citing a
new Utah law, the groups said broad legislation could end
up prohibiting legitimate practices and stifle innovation.
Members of the Federal Trade Commission also urged caution
as officials learn more about the problem and the best way
to combat it.
"I do not believe legislation is the answer at this time,"
said commission member Mozelle Thompson. "Instead, we
should give industry the time to respond. Self-regulation
combined with enforcement of existing laws might be the
best way to go."
The go-slow approach infuriated Barton, who said he
intends to push a spyware bill through his committee - and
the full House - this year.
"You like this stuff? You're the only person in this
country that wants spyware on their computer," he told
Howard Beales, the FTC's consumer protection chief.
Barton urged FTC officials to work with the committee to
draft a new law "instead of trying to defend something
that's indefensible."
Beales said the FTC considers spyware a problem, but wants
to make sure that legislation targets deceptive behavior
while allowing legitimate uses. Some proposed solutions,
such as requiring permission every time a user downloads a
new program, "would make the process of installing new
software extremely tedious," Beales said.
Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash., whose district includes
Kirkland, called it "absolutely astounding" that the FTC
does not see a need for a new law "when we have hundreds
of thousands of violations every day." Inslee introduced a
bill Thursday that would outlaw spyware programs designed
to record Web browsing habits and collect personal data
without notice and consent of the user.
Rep. Mary Bono, R-Calif., has introduced a similar bill
requiring that consumers receive a clear and conspicuous
notice before downloading software. The bill would also
require that third parties disclose their identity to the
consumer, along with a valid e-mail address.
Sens. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and
Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., have introduced a bill
prohibiting installation of software on someone else's
computer without notice and consent. The bill also would
require reasonable "uninstall" procedures for new software.
- 11
- WindowsServer >> Manage local user accounts/groupsHello, can someone tell me if it's possible to manage
local user accounts on the XP machines on my net work
from the server or my PC.
The way you could in NT with user manager and connect to
a local PC on my lan and manipulate the user
accounts/groups?
I want to be able to add a group to every machine on my
network quickly!!
Thanks in advance
- 12
- Directory >> DCPromo over a VPN...Has anyone here managed to do a DCpromo over a VPN connection...we are
opening an office overseas and need to have a local DC out there yet
we need to have them in our Exchange system and be able to share
files...I was wondering if anyone out there has done a DCPromo over a
VPN connection (Hardware VPN, and figure T1 speeds)
Or is it more feasable to create a completely separate domain/forest
out there and just setup a trust? (Can I setup a trust for 2 domains
that are not in the same forest?,,,would Exchange be a problem between
the domains?)
Thanks!
<M>
- 13
- WindowsServices >> Survey permissionHi,
I have created a site in which I am using survey as a Quiz. I have
given site permission as contributer in Anonymous Access for the site.
As while I was giving 'Anonymous Access as reader' then Domain user was
not able to participate in Quiz (Survey).
While now by giving 'Anonymous Access contributer' the domain users are
able to participate in Quiz(Survey) but they are also able to change
Web Part Setting and also able to design(Modify) the page. But I don't
want user to do all these things.
I just want them to participate in survey.
We can't give option to view all responses as that is Quiz not a
survey.
Also In 'Change Permission of the Survey' In the left panal 'Change
anonymous access' all the check boxes for (Add, Edit And View Items)
are disabled so we are not able to set permission for anonymous users.
Please consider as urgent request.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Deepa
- 14
- 15
- WindowsServices >> Looking for a modified Links List Web PartI'm setting up a WSS site for my company. We are using a links list web
part and the list of links has grown longer than fit on one screen.
Someone has suggested a list with the letters A through Z at the top,
so when a user clicks on "N" for example, the list is displayed
starting with the N descriptions.
I'd like to do this as simply as possible. Use what comes out of the
box from Microsoft. Use a web part someone else has written. Buy a web
part. If needed, create one.
This is all fairly new to me, so I'm also looking for pointers on where
to find this kind of information, so when the next question comes
along, I'll have a better idea of where to start looking.
Thanks for your help!
Jim
Jim Puls
Sentinel Technologies
|
|
|