 |
|
Index ‹ Windows OS ‹ WindowsServices
|
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- WindowsMe >> ME getting very slowI have noticed a considerable slowing down of almost all operations
during the past month or so. This is especially noticeable when surfing.
Pages open slowly and even after they open (and status bar says "done")
the cursor remains a thin line and I cannot scroll down. After several
seconds, the cursor pops back to its original arrow shape and I can
scroll. It is getting to be very unpleasant to surf.
I have trimmed my startup programs, run Adware, Spybot, Scandisk, Defrag.
My resources right now read 44%. I am running FireFox 5.1, McAffee,
ZoneAlarm, and SpyBlaster. I use a dialup connection (and there is no
parallel problem with my other computer, running the same programs on XP
Pro, with the same dialup connection).
I don't know if this is a resources problem or what? Not too much more I
can deselect from the startup.
Any ideas appreciated.
Richard, Moving through Molasses
- 3
- active directory >> NT4 to 2003 Active DirectoryOne of the domains that I'm responsible for is still running NT4. Since I'm
unable to decommission it, I'd like to at least upgrade it to Server 2003
SP2 / Active Directory. I have a new PDC with a 7.8GB system partition that
is ready for the upgrade and a new box which will also only have 2003
installed and promoted after the upgrade. All remaining NT4 boxes will be
decommissioned following the upgrade.
DNS & WINS are ran on appliances, not on the domain controllers. Does
anything need done on the client side, since the boxes are joined to
'DOMAIN' vs. 'domain.com'? Or will WINS act as a crutch in this scenario?
Also, is this safe to perform during the day since the BDCs will be up and
authenticating users? I was thinking of leaving one BDC off during the
upgrade to provide a rollback plan, if necessary.
Any help is appreciated.
--
Tim
- 4
- WindowsServer >> Secure RDP ?Does anyone know a good way of allowing a user to have access to a server
using RDP but NOT giving them full Admin permissions ?
I have a bit of software which a member of staff needs to use which is
server based which cannot be run on an end client. It has to be run on the
server.
I really don't want this person playing around [ for obvious reasons ] as I
know they will. I want to restrict access to the program and that only.
I would appreciate any advice on this.
- 5
- Directory >> DCPromo over a VPN...Has anyone here managed to do a DCpromo over a VPN connection...we are
opening an office overseas and need to have a local DC out there yet
we need to have them in our Exchange system and be able to share
files...I was wondering if anyone out there has done a DCPromo over a
VPN connection (Hardware VPN, and figure T1 speeds)
Or is it more feasable to create a completely separate domain/forest
out there and just setup a trust? (Can I setup a trust for 2 domains
that are not in the same forest?,,,would Exchange be a problem between
the domains?)
Thanks!
<M>
- 6
- win2000 >> DVD writerI just want to know whether Windows 2000 server support USB External DVD
Writer?
Thanks in advance
- 7
- Directory >> some machines can't login into domain - HELP!I came into work this morning to find that a whole lot of users are
unable to log into the domain. The machines are just hanging on the
'Applying Computer Settings'.
Its strange, because its Win2k Machines and XP machines that have
these symptoms.
When I unplug the network on the a machine that is having trouble
logging in, it boots up normally and logs in fine.
On one of my domain controllers I'm getting the following error:
Windows cannot access the registry information at
\\spud.com\sysvol\spud.com\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\Machine\registry.pol
with (53).
Any ideas?
Any help would be great.
- 8
- WindowsMe >> Networking / WorkgroupsWindows ME
I am trying to remove a workgroup from a PC. I am unaware of when it was
created or by whom in the family. There are no workgroups and no network.
This is a standalone PC. How do I remove this "MShome" group?
- 9
- WindowsMe >> Spybot S & D Detections Update (2005-06-24)2005-06-24
Dialer
+ Tango ++ TIBS
Hijacker
++ MoneyGainer ++ xxsware Inc. + ISearchTech.PowerScan +
ISearchTech.SideFind (9)
Keylogger
++ Dumaru
Malware
++ Adware.ZioCom.B ++ kz515.com + AzeSearch + ISearchTech.ISTsvc (22) +
ClimaxBucks.InternetOptimizer
This is a detections update. It does not correct the immunization issue
in Win9x.
- 10
- WindowsMe >> Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB905915)Microsoft released yesterday, 13 December (patch Tuesday), a Cumulative
Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB905915). May I
urge al users of Win Me (or come to that any other MS operating system) to
update their system as a matter of urgency as this hotfix addresses a
number of vulnerabilities some of which are already being exploited.
For more details see KB905915 - "MS05-054: Cumulative security update for
Internet Explorer" (http://support.microsoft.com?kbid=905915) and also
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-054
(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-054.mspx).
--
Mike Maltby
mike.maltby@gmail.com
- 11
- Security >> "logon as a service" and "logon as a batch job"Gurus,
I understand, in highly secure environments, where you have to in certain
situations have to give certain accounts the "logon as a service" right.
But how does one know when to also give that account the "logon as a batch
job" right?
--
Spin
- 12
- Security >> Getting certificate context propertiesHi all,
I am developing a small app in C++ and I need to list all the certificates
in the system store, in a List View, like the one displayed in the
CryptUIDlgSelectCertificateFromStore() dialog. I have successfully
enumerated all the certificates using CertEnumCertificatesInStore() but I
can't seem to extract all the bits of information from the certificate
context, i.e. Issued to, Issued by, Intended purposes, Friendly name,
Expiration date and Location. The only pieces of information I have been
able to get so far using CertGetCertificateContextProperty() and
CertGetNameString() is the Issued to, Issued by and Friendly name.
Can anyone tell me how to get the remaining properties?
Kind Regards,
Chris
- 13
- WindowsServer >> Manage local user accounts/groupsHello, can someone tell me if it's possible to manage
local user accounts on the XP machines on my net work
from the server or my PC.
The way you could in NT with user manager and connect to
a local PC on my lan and manipulate the user
accounts/groups?
I want to be able to add a group to every machine on my
network quickly!!
Thanks in advance
- 14
- Security >> House Probes Threat Posed by SpywareApr 29, 7:50 PM (ET)
By MATTHEW DALY
WASHINGTON (AP) - It's the newest computer security
problem to attract the attention of Congress: spyware, or
software designed to collect computer users' personal data
without their knowledge.
Secretly piggybacking on downloaded Internet software,
spyware transmits information about computer usage and
generates pop-up advertisements and other annoyances. It
often is difficult to uninstall.
Little known a few years ago, spyware is now so common
that many consider it the biggest problem for Internet
users since spam.
Microsoft estimates spyware is responsible for half of all
PC crashes and warns that it has become a multimillion-
dollar support issue for computer makers, Internet service
providers and technicians.
In some cases, it makes a computer unusable.
A research lab in Washington state found one of its
computers "hijacked" by pop-up ads, to the point where "we
couldn't do anything," said Patrick Clapshaw, the lab's
director.
After a week of frustration and several visits by
technicians, the problem was eventually solved, but not
before causing at least $500 worth of lost data and
downtime.
Clapshaw, of Kirkland, Wash., calls spyware worse than
spam.
"To me, this is an aggressive computer takeover," he
said. "It's the difference between someone dropping fliers
on your front porch, or walking around your house
following you and annoying you."
Members of Congress are taking the threat seriously. At
least three bills have been introduced to address the
problem, with more likely to follow.
"There is no more pernicious, intrusive activity going on
in the Internet today" than spyware, said Rep. Joe Barton,
R-Texas, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee.
At a hearing Thursday before the panel's subcommittee on
commerce, trade and consumer protection, computer makers
and user groups urged Congress to address deceptive
behavior, rather than ban categories of software. Citing a
new Utah law, the groups said broad legislation could end
up prohibiting legitimate practices and stifle innovation.
Members of the Federal Trade Commission also urged caution
as officials learn more about the problem and the best way
to combat it.
"I do not believe legislation is the answer at this time,"
said commission member Mozelle Thompson. "Instead, we
should give industry the time to respond. Self-regulation
combined with enforcement of existing laws might be the
best way to go."
The go-slow approach infuriated Barton, who said he
intends to push a spyware bill through his committee - and
the full House - this year.
"You like this stuff? You're the only person in this
country that wants spyware on their computer," he told
Howard Beales, the FTC's consumer protection chief.
Barton urged FTC officials to work with the committee to
draft a new law "instead of trying to defend something
that's indefensible."
Beales said the FTC considers spyware a problem, but wants
to make sure that legislation targets deceptive behavior
while allowing legitimate uses. Some proposed solutions,
such as requiring permission every time a user downloads a
new program, "would make the process of installing new
software extremely tedious," Beales said.
Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash., whose district includes
Kirkland, called it "absolutely astounding" that the FTC
does not see a need for a new law "when we have hundreds
of thousands of violations every day." Inslee introduced a
bill Thursday that would outlaw spyware programs designed
to record Web browsing habits and collect personal data
without notice and consent of the user.
Rep. Mary Bono, R-Calif., has introduced a similar bill
requiring that consumers receive a clear and conspicuous
notice before downloading software. The bill would also
require that third parties disclose their identity to the
consumer, along with a valid e-mail address.
Sens. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and
Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., have introduced a bill
prohibiting installation of software on someone else's
computer without notice and consent. The bill also would
require reasonable "uninstall" procedures for new software.
- 15
- Drivers >> OffloadChecksum Test In NDIS 6.5Hi!
My understanding of how protocols/IM drivers parse indicated rx NBLs/NBs is
by accessing the data starting at NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL(NB) and offset by
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB).
Our miniport driver will occasionally shift the offset within the
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL(NB) and will set NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB)
appropriately. Unfortunately, the NDIS 6.5 offloadchecksum test fails and
reports data corruption because it is not taking the
NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET(NB) into consideration. I have verified this
by looking at the MDL it reports as containing corrupted data. In all cases,
the test is looking at data at MDL->MappedSystemVa without offsetting this
by the NET_BUFFER_CURRENT_MDL_OFFSET.
Note that this is the only test that fails. All other tests, such as
offloadlso, works.
Is this a known problem with the NDIS 6.2/NDIS.Net that comes with DTM 1.2?
Thanks!
|
| Author |
Message |
vickit
|
WindowsServices >> Survey permission
Hi,
I have created a site in which I am using survey as a Quiz. I have
given site permission as contributer in Anonymous Access for the site.
As while I was giving 'Anonymous Access as reader' then Domain user was
not able to participate in Quiz (Survey).
While now by giving 'Anonymous Access contributer' the domain users are
able to participate in Quiz(Survey) but they are also able to change
Web Part Setting and also able to design(Modify) the page. But I don't
want user to do all these things.
I just want them to participate in survey.
We can't give option to view all responses as that is Quiz not a
survey.
Also In 'Change Permission of the Survey' In the left panal 'Change
anonymous access' all the check boxes for (Add, Edit And View Items)
are disabled so we are not able to set permission for anonymous users.
Please consider as urgent request.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Deepa
Windows OS262
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
Index ‹ Windows OS ‹ WindowsServices |
- Next
- 1
- WindowsMe >> MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (5614)I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the
"Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody
might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in
uk.misc).
First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my
apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple
of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail.
Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my
internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if
you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and
have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider
(more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection.
OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP
connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking
articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a
nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would
ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or
rec.aquaria to be precise
And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll
never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through,
but the piranha didn';t appear.
by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in
the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy
Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We
haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by
someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian
backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages
to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline
"that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?"
The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone
again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance
people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to
discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles.
=================================================================
In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>,
Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote:
>
>John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote:
>
>: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about?
>: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's
>: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world".
>
>I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things
>from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility
>to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently
>to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my
>identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of
>course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike
>corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now.
:People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named.
:
:I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity?
:To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you
:already have a less than respectful reputation here?
I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime
around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out
of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed
by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something
the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of
people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was
attacked".
Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day,
at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday".
I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so
would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads
then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that.
Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992
I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing
from my mind.
>This is a feature time and time again, that the security services
>(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at
>you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then
>you can do that sort of thing.
:But why? Are you a threat?
They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had
to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're
in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became
"nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with
"ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That
obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they
blithely ignore.
:So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that
:they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big
:logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble,
:it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security
:Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more?
A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment.
BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations,
what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the
covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for
five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security
services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge)
which does the things I've seen these people do.
Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets
to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought
would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with
murder.
And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone.
Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues.
The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me
up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last
year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was
talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got
me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to
the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed.
I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my
room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at
night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what
I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for
"talking to myself".
What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left.
You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a
year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular
happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then.
>What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of
>the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of
>occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but
>they have alwats ducked the challenge.
:Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and
:the people don't know what you are talking about?
Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me
know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted"
by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted.
:What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a
:popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"?
In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home
from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not
saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another
"not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her
country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the
hated enemy.
What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because
they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in
the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment
is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse,
they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter"
who attacked them "at random".
>You know, you're
>passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your
>benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they
>can giggle at.
:Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse
:aimed at you? How can you tell it is?
I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time
the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a
few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y.
You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same
words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of
understanding not to recognize it.
>Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing
>being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain.
:Remind me who PE is again.
PE = "Private Eye"
>: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around
>: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support
>: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma".
>: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly
>: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work
>: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well
>: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again..
>
>: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other
>: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the
>: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"...
>
>No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I
>certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel
>of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of
>abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your
>mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely).
:You did in your mail item.
:
:You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The
:inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part
:of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back",
:silly old me).
:
:You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye
:headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double
:meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double
:entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what?
>The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise
>what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the
>people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may
>seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have...
I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was
written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it
might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of
"sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve.
So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one";
"back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know-
what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of
a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double-
entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause
pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my
former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to
take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their
way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main
obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much
of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go
to court, has just been obliterated by time.
: Smid
==============================================
From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal
Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion
Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995
In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says:
>Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want
>to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour.
>
>I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off
>with him. Which takes a lot.
Hi Snail
This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the
following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was
reading any other threads in uk.media.
It seems he is probably not.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD
technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit
behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just
beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines
of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time,
into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up
remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped
out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where
it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news
readers monitor.
5614
- 2
- win2000 >> Safely Removing HardwareHave a couple Buslink USB external harddrives connected to
a server running Windows 2000 Server. Recently, whenever
one of those drives is connected, there is no "Safely
Remove Hardware" icon located in the system taskbar. If I
go into "Control Panel"->"Add/Remove Hardware" and then
use the wizard to "Uninstall/Unplug a device"-
>"Unplug/Eject a device", the device does not show up in
the window. However, if I go ahead and unplug the device
I get the usual warning stating "Unsafe Removal of Device"
and it lists the device name in the window. Why isn't the
device being recognized in the "Safely Remove Hardware"
window and how do I get it to recognize? I should
mention, when the drives are connected, they show up in
Windows Explorer like normal and they can be used normally.
- 3
- WindowsServices >> Listing of available Web PartsI have users evaluating WSS for their Document Management requirements.
There are a number of things that they want to do that cannot be done
(AFAIK) in the standard product. I would like to know if there are third
party web parts that provide this functionality.
Essentialy the key areas of functionality are:
1. Auto email based on user created date categories (e.g. a Review Date
category will be added to a document library and emails should be auto
generated as this date approaches).
2. Automatically place/update a 'task' in a calendar list based on the
Review Date assigned to a document.
3. [Desirable] automatically insert review tasks for documents into MS
Project.
4. Create printed reports of all documents returned by a given filter
(instead of using 'Edit In Datasheet' and printing that).
5. Key word (not content) search. i.e. have a free text field for each
document into which multiple key words could be entered and provide the
facility to filter by any one keyword (standard filter does not seem to
support this).
6. Filter documents where the review date falls within a date range
(standard filter does not seem to support this).
Can anyone recommend web parts capable of doing any/some/all of the above.
I am a competent VB and SQL Server developer. I have not had a chance to
look at the database structure in WSS, but one possibility would be to try
to develop a VB app that would implement some of the above. If anyone has
experience of working with WSS this way, how difficult would you say this
would be?
TIA
Paul
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Drivers >> VFW developmenthello,
So I did some research and figured out that one way to share my screen
trough flash is with a vfw driver. Before I think about buying one I
want to try develop one of my own.
The situation is that I have a web based application for e-learning
designed in Flash. I want to be able to send a clients desktop screen to
the application. No screenshots but stream. So, the source must be
available in the camera properties of flash. (right click flash movie,
properties, camera tab, dropdown menu).
I also saw that there is a possibility to do this with a mirror driver.
I installed the VNC mirror driver but it don't appear in the flash
properties.
Since I have no experience in writing a vfw driver I wonder if someone
could point me into some direction I should start looking or even give
me some advise about how to do it.
Regards
Tom
- 8
- WindowsServer >> An Error Message Is Displayed When I Attempt to Use the AutomatedWhen I attempt to use the ASR Wizard on Windows Server 2003, I receive
the following error message:
Backup Utility
The files for recovery diskette could not be created. The operation was
canceled.
It does this whether I try to create the file on the c:\ folder or a
floppy (a:\)
I found a KB article with the same error for XP Home but not Server
2003. How do I solve this problem?
Chris
- 9
- WindowsServices >> Sharepoint Menu'sIn Frontpage I have modified the navigation menus and I noticed on the
default the left menu has some prefix and sufix entries you can enter in HTML
code. But I dont see anything that doesthis for the main top level menu. I am
wanting to place graphics along with the links.... so (home graphic) Home ..
(document graphic) Documents & Lists .. (site graphic) Settings link.
Is this described in any MS documentation and I have just missed it.
- 10
- 11
- WindowsMe >> WinME OKNow that the Support is terminated, WinME seems to work better than ever
before, no need to *upgrade* anymore.
What say ye?
Harry.
- 12
- WindowsServices >> Looking for a modified Links List Web PartI'm setting up a WSS site for my company. We are using a links list web
part and the list of links has grown longer than fit on one screen.
Someone has suggested a list with the letters A through Z at the top,
so when a user clicks on "N" for example, the list is displayed
starting with the N descriptions.
I'd like to do this as simply as possible. Use what comes out of the
box from Microsoft. Use a web part someone else has written. Buy a web
part. If needed, create one.
This is all fairly new to me, so I'm also looking for pointers on where
to find this kind of information, so when the next question comes
along, I'll have a better idea of where to start looking.
Thanks for your help!
Jim
Jim Puls
Sentinel Technologies
- 13
- Drivers >> Errors in the Printer Driver when buildingHi Guys!
Good day! I am currently developing a printer driver based on the samples
provided in the WDK. I was able to build and integrate a TIFF library so that
my output will be in TIFF rather than in Bitmap. My problem now is that I am
trying to put a custom property sheet in the printer driver but i am getting
these errors (see error snippet). I have already included the required
headers for the property sheet (see header snippet) but I am still getting
these errors.
I am building the code using the Windows XP checked Build Environment
provided in the WDK.
Any ideas?
Thank you!
********Error snippet***********
errors in directory c:\winddk\3790~1.183\src\print\oemdll\redmapprinter
c:\winddk\3790.1830\src\print\oemdll\redmapprinter\oemui.h(39) : error
C2061: sy
ntax error : identifier 'POEMCUIPPARAM'
c:\winddk\3790.1830\src\print\oemdll\redmapprinter\oemui.h(40) : error
C2061: sy
ntax error : identifier 'IPrintOemDriverUI'
Compiling - enable.cpp for i386
Compiling - generating code... for i386
Building Library -
c:\winddk\3790~1.183\src\print\oemdll\i386\redmapprinter.lib
for i386
LIB : error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'objchk_wxp_x86\i386\devmode.obj'
BUILD: Compile errors: not linking
c:\winddk\3790~1.183\src\print\oemdll\redmapp
rinter directory
BUILD: Done
8 files compiled - 1 Warning - 2 Errors
1 library built - 1 Error
C:\WINDDK\3790~1.183\src\print\oemdll\RedmapPrinter>
******Header Snippet*******
#include <STDDEF.H>
#include <STDLIB.H>
#include <OBJBASE.H>
#include <STDARG.H>
#include <STDIO.H>
#include <WINDEF.H>
#include <WINERROR.H>
#include <WINBASE.H>
#include <WINGDI.H>
#include <WINDDI.H>
#include <WINSPOOL.H>
#include <TCHAR.H>
#include <EXCPT.H>
#include <ASSERT.H>
#include <PRSHT.H>
#include "COMPSTUI.H"
#include <WINDDIUI.H>
#include <PRINTOEM.H>
#include <PRCOMOEM.H>
- 14
- Directory >> Allocate storage area for a specific usershi all. i am a new user. i am using windows 2003 server R2. i am facing a
problem to allocate specific storage for a specific user. suppose there are 3
domain users in my domain. how can i allocate storge area(suppose 5GB for
each user from D drive from server computer). when the client(Domain users)
logon from their machine to server the storage area will visible in their
computer as like C,D,E. how can i do that?
- 15
- win2000 >> Help! returns INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE when CreateFile() calledHi,
I written a win2k plug n play driver for pcmcia 16 bit PC card.From my
application I want to open a handle for our device. In my Application I
used SetupDi* functions to get the Device name. Later I called the
CreateFIle() function.
After calling SetupDi* functions finally I got Device interface
name in string variable
deviceInterfaceDetailData->DevicePath.
I called the above string variable as first parameter in CreateFile()
function.
My Device Interface name string is
"\\?\pcmcia#apoorva_1553_pcmcia_card..-apollo_c.labs-77f7#1#{643e59f2-a018-=
=AD432c-87c3-9bfc-93b5bedc}"
HANDLE hndfpga;
CreateFile(deviceInterfaceDetailData->DevicePath,
GENERIC_READ|GENERIC_WRITE,0,NULL,OPEN_EXISTING,0,NULL);
If I call the above function Iam getting the return value as
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, With GetLastError() function Iam getting the
error code 50.which is nothing but,
"The Network Request is not supported".
What could be the reason? Any mistake is there in the above procedure
please correct it.
Or if any other methods are there to get a handle of a device please
guide me.=20
Thanks in Advance.=20
Mahi
|
|
|